Validity and Reliability Measurement of the Knowledge and Attitude Survey Regarding Pain Tool Vietnamese Version

Main Article Content

Nga Nguyen Thi
Anh Truong Tuan
Hoang Duong Huy
Nhu Pham Thi Thuy
Hai Vu Thi
Phuong Dao Thi
Phuong Doan Thi
Hanh Pham Thi

Abstract

Introduction: Knowledge and attitude regarding pain management is one of the factors with the highest predictive value and it can explain 69% of nurses' s pain management practice [2]. Therefore, a standard tool to measure the pain management knowledge and attitude of nurses in Vietnam is needed.


Objective: Testing the validity and reliability of the Knowledge and attitudes survey regarding pain tool Vietnamese version (KASRP -V), so as to measure the nurse's pain management knowledge level in Vietnam


Method: The psychometric properties testing of KASRP tool Vietnamese version has undergone a strict standardization process including testing for content validity, discriminant validity, test-retest reliability, internal consistency reliability. 6 experts assessed the content validity. 50 nurses and 73 nursing students were selected to collect data for the discriminant validity testing. Thirty nurses out of 50 nurses were selected to collect data for the internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability testing.


Results:The KASRP tool Vietnamese version includes 41 items, the CVI index for each item ranged from 0.83-1, S-CVI=0.996. The discriminant validity was verified because there was a difference in knowledge scores between the group of nurses with experience in patient care and the group of 4th years nursing students (Z=-2.256, p=0.01).. Internal consistency reliability was measured by Cronbach alpha score. The Cronbach alpha value of each item ranged from 0.885 - 0.887 and the total score was 0.888. The correlation coefficient between each item with the total ranged from 0.300 - 0.446. The ICC score = 0.977 (with 95% CI=0.631-0.994, p = .000) was measured to assess test-retest reliability


Conclusion: This evaluation of the KASRP -V demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability

Article Details

How to Cite
Nga Nguyen Thi, Anh Truong Tuan, Hoang Duong Huy, Nhu Pham Thi Thuy, Hai Vu Thi, Phuong Dao Thi, Phuong Doan Thi, & Hanh Pham Thi. (2023). Validity and Reliability Measurement of the Knowledge and Attitude Survey Regarding Pain Tool Vietnamese Version . International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies, 3(3), 504–518. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v3-i3-36
Section
Articles

References

I. Bartoszczyk DA, Gilbertson-White S. Interventions for nurse-related barriers in cancer pain management. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2015; 42; 634 - 641. Doi: 10.1188/15.ONF.634-641

II. Alzghoul B, Abdullah NAC. Pain Management Practices by Nurses: An Application of the Knowledge, Attitude and Practices (KAP) Model. Global Journal of Health Science. 2015; 8(6): 154 - 160. Doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n6p154

III. AL‐Sayaghi KM, Fadlalmola HA, Aljohani WA, et al. Nurses’Knowledgeand attitudes regarding pain assessment and Management in Saudi Arabia. Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(3): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10030528

IV. Shahriary S, Shiryazdi SM, Shiryazdi SA, et al. Oncology Nurses Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Cancer Pain Management. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015; 16(17): 7501–6. Doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.17.7501

V. Tran, Q. P. Knowledge and attitude about postoperative pain management of nurses at the Institute of Trauma and Orthopedics, Viet Duc Hospital. Journal of Nursing Scienc. 2020; 3(4): 58–64. Doi: 10.54436/jns

VI. Nguyen AT, Dang AK, Nguyen HTT, et al. Assessing Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Pain Management Among Nurses Working in a Geriatric Hospital in Vietnam. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2021; 14: 799 – 807. Doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S285044

VII. Bernhofer EI, St Marie B, Bena JF. A new clinical pain knowledge test for nurses: development and psychometric evaluation. Pain Manag Nurs. 2017; 18(4): 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2017.04.009.

VIII. Manworren RC. Development and testing of the pediatric nurses’ knowledge and attitudes survey regarding pain. Pediatric Nursing. 2001; 27(2): 151 – 158. PMID: 12962251.

IX. Lebovits AH, Florence I, Bathina R, et al. Pain knowledge and attitudes of healthcare providers: practice characteristic differences. Clin J Pain. 1997; 13(3):237-43. Doi: 10.1097/00002508-199709000-00009.

X. Ferrell B, McCaffery M. Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain. 2014. Retrieved from http://prc.coh.org/Knowldege%20%20&%20Attitude%20Survey% 207-14.pdf.

XI. Arumugam V, et al. Attitudes, knowledge and behaviors related to evidence-based practice in health professionals involved in pain management. Int. J. Evid. Based Health. 2018; 16(2): 107-118. Doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000131

XII. Zhang C, Hsu L, Zou BR, Li J, et al. Effects of a pain education program on nurses’ pain knowledge, attitudes and pain assessment practices in China. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2008; 36(6): 616–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.12.020

XIII. Yildirim Y, Cicek F, Uyar M. Knowledge and attitudes of Turkish oncology nurses about cancer pain management. Pain Management Nursing. 2008; 9(1): 17–25. Doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2007.09.002

XIV. Kwon SH, Kim H, Park S, et al. Development of knowledge and attitudes survey on pain management for Korean long-term care professionals. Asian Nurs Re. 2020; 14 (2); 105 - 113. Doi:10.1016/j.anr.2020.04.002.

XV. Hang NT, Hien MHB, Tuan DT, et al. Knowledge and attitudes of nurses about pain management in cancer patients undergoing inpatient treatment at the oncology hospital. Vietnam Journal of Oncology. 2020 : 441-447. Avilable at https://123docz.net/document/6840510-kien-thuc-va-thai-do-cua-dieu-duong-ve-quan-ly-dau-tren-benh-nhan-ung-thu-dang-dieu-tri-noi-tru-tai-benh-vien-ung-buou.htm

XVI. Kubinger KD. On artificial results due to using factor analysis for dichotomous variables. Psychol Sci. 2003; 45(1): 106 - 110. Avilable at: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-11002-006

XVII. Armstrong T S, Cohen M Z, Eriksen L, et al. Content validity of self-report measurement instruments: An illustration from the development of the Brain Tumor Module of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2005; 32(3):669-676. Doi: 10.1188/05.ONF.669-676.

XVIII. Gunawan J, Marzilli C, Aungsuroch Y. Establishing appropriate sample size for developing and validating a questionnaire in nursing research. Belitung Nursing Journal. 2021; 7(5): 356 - 360. https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.1927.

XIX. Burns N, Grove SK. The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique and utilization. United States: Elsevier/Saunders. 2005

XX. Downs F . Reading in research methodology. 2 ed. Lippincott. 1999

XXI. Walt CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER. Measurement in nursing and health research. 3 ed. Springer. 2005

XXII. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ. Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis 7th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education. 2010

XXIII. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. 2000

XXIV. Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine. 2016; 15: 155-163.

Doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012

XXV. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006; 29: 489 – 97. pmid:16977646

XXVI. Yu W, Li D, Lu Y, et al. Knowledge and Attitudes of Chinese Oncology Nurses Regarding Cancer Pain Management - a Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Cancer Education. 2021; 36(5):1115-1123. Doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01743-z.

XXVII. Zuazua-Rico D, Mosteiro-Diaz MP, Maestro-Gonzalez A, et al. Nursing workload, knowledge about pain, and their relation to pain records. Pain Management Nursing. 2020; 21(6):510-515. Doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2020.03.009.